EMP wrote:
I don't know where you all got the idea I said to just base it off the applications. I never said to base it only on applications. I am saying that in this case the application had no impact whether it was 100 words or 1,000 words. You should do an interview process at least instead of an application or make the application simply putting yourself up for candidacy as Global Moderator seeing as the current application process is nonconstructive and doesn't have an impact. They do interviews for jobs in the real world for a reason. They don't let people free to work on applications for hours saying make them look nice and blah blah blah when the only things they are basing it on have nothing to do with the application itself. You can see my point can you not?

[quote="EMP" post=109873] I don't think you even get what your saying. Your whole view is based around, that you don't think he had a shot at Global Mod, when in fact the vote was very very close. We don't just look at applications, if we just looked at applications any minge who can type nicly would be staff. We look at who we feel would be most suited for the position and base it off that.[/quote] I don't know where you all got the idea I said to just base it off the applications. I never said to base it only on applications. I am saying that in this case the application had no impact whether it was 100 words or 1,000 words. You should do an interview process at least instead of an application or make the application simply putting yourself up for candidacy as Global Moderator seeing as the current application process is nonconstructive and doesn't have an impact. They do interviews for jobs in the real world for a reason. They don't let people free to work on applications for hours saying make them look nice and blah blah blah when the only things they are basing it on have nothing to do with the application itself. You can see my point can you not?