I just skimmed your application: it's not the best, and not the worst.

Let's look at a few pointers.

You say...


But...
This would more suitably constitute New Life Rule, which actually doesn't state whether you can act upon details of your previous life as you can see here:



You say...


But...
At ZARP, unless someone is EVIDENTLY and PLAINLY harassing someone, for example with false reports that dispute events that didn't even occur in an attempt to slander someone, this wouldn't happen.

Simply because someone misinterpreted something, or didn't understand why someone did something, and challenged it - it doesn't mean that they are in the wrong. As a matter of technicality, I can't identify any rule or term in which you could consider justifying an enactment of punishment for this reason.

I suggest that you change this.

You say...


But...
Understand that the logs do not take into account the location of death. This is an essential factor when considering whether someone violated NLR or not.

Please consider how you would go about understanding a NLR report in some more detail, as you simply haven't come close to a full solution.

Until you have changed these...
Your application is marginally decent; I can't judge you based on your attitude and behavior in practice. Consider the above and I will make a personal verdict.

I just skimmed your application: it's not the best, and not the worst. Let's look at a few pointers. [b]You say...[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/g99hp/a92872801b.png[/img] [b]But...[/b] This would more suitably constitute New Life Rule, which actually doesn't state whether you can act upon details of your previous life as you can see here: [img]http://puu.sh/g99io/0967ed377a.png[/img] [b]You say...[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/g99kE/27e43798b1.png[/img] [b]But...[/b] At ZARP, unless someone is [i]EVIDENTLY[/i] and [i]PLAINLY[/i] harassing someone, for example with false reports that dispute events that didn't even occur in an attempt to slander someone, this wouldn't happen. Simply because someone misinterpreted something, or didn't understand why someone did something, and challenged it - it doesn't mean that they are in the wrong. As a matter of technicality, I can't identify any rule or term in which you could consider justifying an enactment of punishment for this reason. I suggest that you change this. [b]You say...[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/g99tf/7a5a392bfb.png[/img] [b]But...[/b] Understand that the logs do not take into account the [i]location[/i] of death. This is an essential factor when considering whether someone violated NLR or not. Please consider how you would go about understanding a NLR report in some more detail, as you simply haven't come close to a full solution. [b]Until you have changed these...[/b] Your application is marginally decent; I can't judge you based on your attitude and behavior in practice. Consider the above and I will make a personal verdict.