darealflorisss wrote:
The tone depends on how you read it.
Evidence = not needed so who knows his reasons behind the ban?
If you are implying that staff members here have ulterior motives behind bans, you must realize that an administrator is a trusted rank and hardly anyone achieves it with ulterior motives. If they do, and you produce counter evidence they are then demoted. All their work gone. They don't need evidence to ban, only to defend their claims.
Also, there is no way I can read any of your posts and not find a hint of disrespect. Even as jokes they seem to have a bitter undertone.