Cubsbb wrote: correct if you don't have proof of him breaking rules? Then you would need more evidence thus , we cannot believe that he has broken any other rules

[quote="Cubsbb" post=88845]he should be its not the first time he has broken a rules just the first one that i have evidence to back it up.[/quote] correct if you don't have proof of him breaking rules? Then you would need more evidence thus , we cannot believe that he has broken any other rules