OutstandingCitizen wrote:
then clearly your problem lies with the selection process, sire. you state that some young moderators are mature, some older ones aren't exactly that, and so the only way to resolve the issue of 'immaturity' being what you make out to be a cogent issue in the staff team is to root out the problem for everyone, not discriminate against certain categories.

put it into perspective, say that 90% of a communities' demoted staff members are of chinese ethnicity. 10% are the best staff in town. it would simply be racist to apply such restrictions in the application process.

[quote="OutstandingCitizen" post=80002][quote="Exrobite" post=79998][quote="OutstandingCitizen" post=79995][quote="Chris" post=79992]i would like to appeal to the moderators of this forum that this thread is closed on the basis that it influences a prejudice and is of stereotypical origin, with regard the members who have been on this planet less than 16 years, and as such it doesn't correspond with ZARP's 'open to all' mindset.[/quote] pathetic chris you are pathetic my opinion is not based on a stereotype but my personal experience with the moderators on the server but whatever[/quote] So your experience with a few <16 mods dictates your opinion on them all? Sounds like stereotyping to me.[/quote] If you read my post I said that I understand some young moderators are mature but the majority who I have met are imature and bad moderators[/quote] then clearly your problem lies with the selection process, sire. you state that some young moderators are mature, some older ones aren't exactly that, and so the only way to resolve the issue of 'immaturity' being what you make out to be a cogent issue in the staff team is to root out the problem for everyone, not discriminate against certain categories. put it into perspective, say that 90% of a communities' demoted staff members are of chinese ethnicity. 10% are the best staff in town. it would simply be racist to apply such restrictions in the application process.