First of all this can't be used as evidence. As first of all you were one of the cop so this evidence is complete <strong>biased</strong>. Now!
I do admit I did say that and Gmod Troller helped cops as a gangster because u did say u needed proof to warrant me then he came in and bought a printer so u can warrant us. NOW! I DID demote gmod for Failrp then got random warned by australian which is abuse because he doesn't agree that my reason was a valid reason because Australian said: "I know they have printers we just need to prove it" then gmod came in and <strong>BOUGHT</strong> a printer at that time to help the cops then I demoted him for <strong>FailRP</strong>. As a admin. <strong>No offence.</strong> you are supposed to listen to players not FREEZE them and mute them and speak when they are telling you what happened. So I have done nothing wrong but get mad when a gangster abuses his job and I demote him for Failrp because he did then I get warned for it and the admin does NOTHING about it. And gmod troller also RDMed a cop and who killed him?? Oh let me guess?! <strong>Australian</strong> the same admin who warned me for random demote while <strong>didn't</strong> warn him for RDM. So your evidence doesn't prove <strong>ANYTHING</strong> but me getting mad because a gangster abused his job and I demoted him and Australian <strong>random warning</strong> me after I explained why it is not false demote. <strong>BUT</strong> obviously this <em>"Evidence"</em> doesn't show that I explained or the <strong>FULL</strong> story.
<strong><em>Because it is biased from a cop from the cops who were helping the admin</em></strong> Now, the option of banning me is not up to me. But being <strong><em>HONEST</em></strong>(Something you aren't being) I wouldn't ban myself for doing that because I did nothing wrong when an admin did nothing about someone breaking the rules then the admin breaks the rule and says that I false demoted that guy