Have to agree with johnny here. This is useless without evidence, people that report are reporting Johnny without proof. Or they're jealous/angry of him for some reason. I see no reason, he's smart knows how to respond very well. He doesn't lie himself out of it. He talks in logic to get him self out of a invalid report. I still am figuring if Zans post is a troll or what.

@Hamp
I can just get a couple of people and report one person with no proof. Does that mean we need to believe this group? You mean, alot of reports with "NO" proof means instant proof? No. I can't argue with this logic.

Have to agree with johnny here. This is useless without evidence, people that report are reporting Johnny without proof. Or they're jealous/angry of him for some reason. I see no reason, he's smart knows how to respond very well. He doesn't lie himself out of it. He talks in logic to get him self out of a invalid report. I still am figuring if Zans post is a troll or what. @Hamp I can just get a couple of people and report one person with no proof. Does that mean we need to believe this group? You mean, alot of reports with "NO" proof means instant proof? No. I can't argue with this logic.