So he's allowed to get away with not justifying his ban at all and just calling out 'u r a liar' without evidence simply because you trust him? And once again you're strawmanning, simply denying every point i've made just because and making baseless assumptions.


The thing that really annoys me is that, without ANY evidence, TW!X's claims (that are based around irrelevent strawmanning in the first place) have worked to actually EXTEND my ban. That makes no sense as I have no broken any further rules, so why should the ban be extended?

So he's allowed to get away with not justifying his ban at all and just calling out 'u r a liar' without evidence simply because you trust him? And once again you're strawmanning, simply denying every point i've made just because and making baseless assumptions. The thing that really annoys me is that, without ANY evidence, TW!X's claims (that are based around irrelevent strawmanning in the first place) have worked to actually EXTEND my ban. That makes no sense as I have no broken any further rules, so why should the ban be extended?