Darth
No. I was arguing the claim that he killed you with the prop. The prop didn't touch the car when you died, but you died just before it did (and I don't even know if it did at that point). You may have died from being shot in crossfire, or some other reason). If you really want me to, I'll slow that video down tenfold so you can see it better.

Moody was therefore the main person affected in the issue, as he was definitely propkilled by Angelus. We'll see if he was bothered by the little muck about he was having when he comes online next.

Not everyone notices that little box in the bottom left, by the way.

Well, I'm not here to argue about your warn as I don't know the real details of it.

You contradict yourself massively here. Since when was teleporting considered RP? Anyway, Angelus wasn't RPing and therefore he's allowed to noclip.

Great idea, next time what I'll do is press the upload button and get on with my day, and say that I spent 24 hours on the video I want to use to demote someone - because that makes the evidence oh-so much more valid.

He may have felt pressured by the situation to do so, and I don't feel that with the current situation Angelus had the capacity to validly say what he did. I am defending him because I think he needs a fair trial, and not to just give up.

Because we want what we see as the best outcome for this, and we CAN defend him for that reason.

Blazer
It's not what you meant, it's the fact that you made up an excuse for saying 'CDM doesn't matter.'

Since when do you, a demoted member of staff with an often questioned attitude to others, define what is 'enough' for a demotion? It's a lead team decision, but we'll take the expert opinion into account, thanks.

[b]Darth[/b] [quote]Seriously Chris[/quote] No. I was arguing the claim that he [i]killed[/i] you with the prop. The prop didn't touch the car when you died, but you died just before it did (and I don't even know if it did at that point). You may have died from being shot in crossfire, or some other reason). If you really want me to, I'll slow that video down tenfold so you can see it better. Moody was therefore the main person affected in the issue, as he was [u]definitely[/u] propkilled by Angelus. We'll see if he was bothered by the little muck about he was having when he comes online next. [quote]read the chat[/quote] Not everyone notices that little box in the bottom left, by the way. [quote]Also, I was in an F1 and I noclipped back to my base if you recall. I was in my base before handling it. [/quote] Well, I'm not here to argue about your warn as I don't know the real details of it. [quote]Angelus noclipped from spawn to the villa to have fun, and if that was not considered RP he wouldn't have "taken his revenge" and TPed to me to m202 me as a citizen...[/quote] You contradict yourself massively here. Since when was teleporting considered RP? Anyway, Angelus wasn't RPing and therefore he's allowed to noclip. [quote]I wouldn't have taken so much of my time to upload the videos or reply to everyone who thinks that Angelus is innocent.[/quote] Great idea, next time what I'll do is press the upload button and get on with my day, and say that I spent 24 hours on the video I want to use to demote someone - because that makes the evidence oh-so much more valid. [quote]he did say that everything in the videos is abuse/rulebreaking and he takes full responsibility for what he did[/quote] He may have felt pressured by the situation to do so, and I don't feel that with the current situation Angelus had the capacity to validly say what he did. I am defending him because I think he needs a fair trial, and not to just give up. [quote]DO NOT UNDERSTAND why all of you are still defending him..[/quote] Because we want what we see as the best outcome for this, and we CAN defend him for that reason. [b]Blazer[/b] [quote]I think I know what I posted and what I meant by it better than you[/quote] It's not what you meant, it's the fact that you made up an excuse for saying 'CDM doesn't matter.' [quote]video 1 would be enough.[/quote] Since when do you, a demoted member of staff with an often questioned attitude to others, define what is 'enough' for a demotion? It's a lead team decision, but we'll take the expert opinion into account, thanks.