Wait, so they don't have superiors to deal with cases like these?
Other Administrators can just handle them?
Because if that's the case, then this is clearly going to be deemed invalid.
I don't have to proof I was standing on the door, or wasn't standing on the door. I proofed I was slayed without a warning or any evidence given to the Administrator. It would be dumb if I had to contradict myself or proof myself right everytime I was slayed. Because with that logic, they could slay\ban anyone and tell them to proof you weren't doing what they say you were doing.
Can a superior reply on this as I'm sure there are others that actually are supposed to deal with reports.
Like I said, if I wasn't slayed for no reason I wouldn't have called him a moron. I normally don't bait/flame on games, unless I get abused like I was now. The removal of my warning would be a fair trade for the slay that wasn't needed.
ZeroGravity wrote:
Its a rule many people have seen you standing on that door and not just RandomdudeDK have seen it other staff-members saw it aswell.
This makes your opinion in the case biased, as RandomdudeDK was the only staff member within the server when he slayed me.