darmag wrote:
You should try a better example, not having a weapons doesn't mean it was RDM.

darmag wrote:
NLR applies even if the cause of death was rule breaking, only exception is if you get TP'd to an admin sit.

darmag wrote:
You're gonna need a more detailed explanation if possible.
darmag wrote:
Valid point, but you wouldn't know what happened, so you need to take the evidence of what you saw or see into account.


Frankly, I think you need to be a bit more informed of the rules and re-read what's missing in your answers. I'll have to -support unless fixed or improved.

[quote="darmag" post=53131] Explain R.D.M-Random Death Match. Player killed another player without a veiled reason. and give an example scenario, Dan killed Maria when Maria does not have a weapon [/quote] You should try a better example, not having a weapons doesn't mean it was RDM. [quote="darmag" post=53131] Explain N.L.R-New Life Rule. That mean, player that died by another player by, mug or raid cannot return to the place that he died. If he died by R.D.M the N.L.R does not mean anything+New Life Rule AKA NLR is when a player doesn't forget his old life [/quote] NLR applies even if the cause of death was rule breaking, only exception is if you get TP'd to an admin sit. [quote="darmag" post=53131] Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player 1 accuses player 2 for RDMing him, log shows that player 2 killed player 1. I would need proof this is RDM, because it could have been a raid or a mug. [/quote] You're gonna need a more detailed explanation if possible. [quote="darmag" post=53131] Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time. This may have been another reason in the streets near where he was, AKA he may have been mugging Player x after his raid finished. [/quote] Valid point, but you wouldn't know what happened, so you need to take the evidence of what you saw or see into account. Frankly, I think you need to be a bit more informed of the rules and re-read what's missing in your answers. I'll have to -support unless fixed or improved.