Hi Frenchie,

First off, some advice: you should definitely add formatting to your application to make its visual appeal better.

This part is really badly answered. You need to make it more clear, and not just make it a series of questions. Obviously don't just copy this, but here's how I'd answer it:

The same applies to the part after that, however only with NLR. The NLR is practically proven in the question as the kills are described as being close together, you just need to structure how you would handle the situation into words.

For the metagaming response, you should NOT advise people to advert for any purpose other than business purposes - generally anything that would be classed as an 'advert' (makes sense, eh?)

Last but not least, your final 'extended' section hasn't reached the minimum word requirement (150 words)

Please rectify the issues mentioned.

Regards,

Hi Frenchie, First off, some advice: you should definitely add formatting to your application to make its visual appeal better. [quote]Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x. Hello how can i help? Ok so player y rdmed you do you have any proof?? If you do then put it on your profile. If you don't then there is nothing I can do sorry.[/quote] This part is really badly answered. You need to make it more clear, and not just make it a series of questions. Obviously don't just copy this, but here's how I'd answer it: [code]Since the logs showed that player y did indeed kill player x: I would bring player Y, paste the kill to them and ask for reasoning. If the reasoning is invalid, I would deliver appropriate punishment. If the reason is valid or player Y is AFK, I would ask the player if they have any evidence that proves the kill didn't carry a valid RP reason. Otherwise, I'd advise them to be vigilante when they feel they're up against users prone to breaking rules and get screenshots/video where possible in future. I'd also close the situation by wishing them both a good day and requesting that they use F1 if they require further assistance.[/code] The same applies to the part after that, however only with NLR. The NLR is practically proven in the question as the kills are described as being close together, you just need to structure how you would handle the situation into words. For the metagaming response, you should [u]NOT[/u] advise people to advert for any purpose other than business purposes - generally anything that would be classed as an 'advert' (makes sense, eh?) Last but not least, your final 'extended' section hasn't reached the minimum word requirement ([i]150 words[/i]) Please rectify the issues mentioned. Regards,