Christopher wrote:
First of all, by referring to 'Taco' as a 'minge' because he had given you a -support, you are being extremely opinionated, nonconstructive and immature.

He's entitled to a justified opinion. If you don't agree with it, you keep it to what you said. I cite that the points you referred two as one and two would be a mediocre argument to his opinion.

You've even done this in the past:
http://gyazo.com/bd220e574e5160a06bc564459e6ac6c7.png?1365688726

Bonding: I have seen you before, but I don't recall this being for positive reasoning, or any reasoning at all. Either way, you have little community bonding or the wrong community bonding.

I recommend making greater use of the forums and the OOC chat so that you can bond further with the community.

English: You are being immodest by claiming a rank of 9.5. Within your presentation, inclusive of responses - you have maintained adequate grammar, included some spelling errors which suggests a laziness to use a spell-checker, and overall - it's not presented to appease the eye. It's not a mandatory criteria, but it definitely can make the right first impression when someone takes a look at your application.

Taco is correct in claiming that your 'rule area' is brief. It could definitely go into more depth. Especially with the consequences section.

Very little improvement from your previous applications too:
http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming ... 2.msg15459
http://zarpgaming.com/index.php?topic=1578.msg13873


Overall, you're not a pleasant person. On an 'above average' application, you had responded with:


[size=360:saj1myac]-SUPPORT[/size]
[/quote]
DENIED

[quote=Christopher] [quote=[ZARP]Charlie] 3 You stop being a minge. [/quote] First of all, by referring to 'Taco' as a 'minge' because he had given you a [color=red]-support[/color], you are being extremely opinionated, nonconstructive and immature. He's entitled to a justified opinion. If you don't agree with it, you keep it to what you said. I cite that the points you referred two as one and two would be a mediocre argument to his opinion. You've even done this in the past: [img]http://gyazo.com/bd220e574e5160a06bc564459e6ac6c7.png?1365688726[/img] [b]Bonding:[/b] I have seen you before, but I don't recall this being for positive reasoning, or any reasoning at all. Either way, you have little community bonding or the wrong community bonding. I recommend making greater use of the forums and the OOC chat so that you can bond further with the community. [b]English:[/b] You are being immodest by claiming a rank of 9.5. Within your presentation, inclusive of responses - you have maintained adequate grammar, included some spelling errors which suggests a laziness to use a spell-checker, and overall - it's not presented to appease the eye. It's not a mandatory criteria, but it definitely can make the right first impression when someone takes a look at your application. Taco is correct in claiming that your 'rule area' is brief. It could definitely go into more depth. [b]Especially [/b]with the consequences section. Very little improvement from your previous applications too: [url=http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming.com/phpbblive//viewtopic.php?t=12.msg15459]http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming ... 2.msg15459[/url] [url=http://zarpgaming.com/index.php?topic=1578.msg13873]http://zarpgaming.com/index.php?topic=1578.msg13873[/url] Overall, you're not a pleasant person. On an 'above average' application, you had responded with: [img]http://gyazo.com/74da6cb41f2d0ad45cb67bd480b6663f.png[/img] [size=360:saj1myac][color=red]-SUPPORT[/color][/size] [/quote] [color=red][size=5]DENIED[/size][/color]