Story:
TL;DR: I placed a tactical insertion near the cinema, allowing me to respawn and kill Richard after he killed me. Richard claims the "New Life Rule" (NLR) applies because it’s not in the same district, but I argue that NLR doesn’t apply since I used a tactical insertion, and the cinema is logically in the same district. Richard's interpretation seems inconsistent with how the tactical insertion works.

Extra information:
TL;DR: Richard is using the NLR claim out of anger because he lost his 12-hour mayor streak, despite the kill being valid and no rules being broken. His reaction seems driven by frustration, and he tends to rely on others' opinions instead of making his own decisions, showing a lack of responsibility as a staff member.

[b]Story[/b]: TL;DR: I placed a tactical insertion near the cinema, allowing me to respawn and kill Richard after he killed me. Richard claims the "New Life Rule" (NLR) applies because it’s not in the same district, but I argue that NLR doesn’t apply since I used a tactical insertion, and the cinema is logically in the same district. Richard's interpretation seems inconsistent with how the tactical insertion works. [b]Extra information[/b]: TL;DR: Richard is using the NLR claim out of anger because he lost his 12-hour mayor streak, despite the kill being valid and no rules being broken. His reaction seems driven by frustration, and he tends to rely on others' opinions instead of making his own decisions, showing a lack of responsibility as a staff member.