sinzz wrote:
Not a matter of "if u want" but rather of a fact. He didn't do anything wrong by making a decision not to warn someone over your report, especially a minor rulebreak such as that one. His outcome was purely based on your evidence and he followed the staff guidelines and ethos accordingly and dealt with your "situation" to the best of his abilities. Just because you didn't like the verdict doesn't make Dutch a bad staff member or any less qualified for a LT role.

Shit, maybe if you used your pigeon brain for once you'd understand these things.

Anyhow DutchCat, best of luck!

[quote="sinzz" post=1412510][spoiler][quote="JoshuaIsGreat" post=1412508][quote="sinzz" post=1412496][quote="xDutchCat" post=1412481][quote="sinzz" post=1412480]no :minussp:[/quote] [center][color=#ff0000][b] Very constructive.[/quote] you know why I'm saying no and you clearly understand so don't change this to what u think is it but are really not :) bud[/quote] You are minus supporting him because of a situation where there was a gray zone and he used his staff discretion to make a decision and you didn't like that decision. that's kind of epic. :clap:[/quote][/spoiler] If u want[/quote] Not a matter of "if u want" but rather of a fact. He didn't do anything wrong by making a decision not to warn someone over your report, especially a minor rulebreak such as that one. His outcome was purely based on your evidence and he followed the staff guidelines and ethos accordingly and dealt with your "situation" to the best of his abilities. Just because you didn't like the verdict doesn't make Dutch a bad staff member or any less qualified for a LT role. Shit, maybe if you used your pigeon brain for once you'd understand these things. Anyhow DutchCat, best of luck! :plussp: