After an in depth discussion and requesting some sort of proof that you were flipping on behalf of Turtlx (again if you come forward with any this can be reopened) or proof that you owned a golden mummy from when you accepted the flip, or anything to defend your case. All afternoon bobby has been posting the same message at Turtlx trying to flip golden mummy vs the same and when he did it this time you for one reason or another accepted it knowing you did not own a golden mummy suit even to the point of saying "joking" spoons chiming in telling you you are forced to coinflip really didn't help this situation. Bobby was an absolute idiot for continuing the coinflip with everyone knowing that you never have owned a golden mummy, this shouldn't mean he should lose his item in what would have been a risk free coinflip. For me personally this would fall under trickery although some disagree, in my personal opinion coinflipping items you do not own should NOT be allowed. I will give the same hypothetical I did when discussing this with Martin so hopefully you and/or others can see my point of view. You could quite easily get a brand new steam account, buy gmod, stick on a VPN, join the server, find someone coinflipping an expensive item they own without a targeted message and agree forcing them to coinflip against your nothing with nothing more than your alternate account being banned making it practically risk free. I'm sure if you were in that situation you would find it to be rather unfair. Please understand I am open to have this reopened if new evidence from yourself or turtlx comes out that you did in fact agree that you were flipping on his behalf and or you owned a golden mummy at the start of the flip. This is being denied for the reason that you accepted into a coinflip for an item that you didn't own which in my personal opinion falls into trickery although no action will be taken, on top of that you claimed to be joking only to seemingly redact your joke after winning a risk free coinflip.