It's largely pathetic to see CM team handle a situation like this the way that they did.
CM team seems to be so egotistical in the way that other people's opinions and explanations no longer matter.
The uranium processor was made the way it was. It was purposely made to give different items depending on how much uranium you put in.
The issue that whoever coded said feature made it the way it is, and was not tested properly, should not be seen as an exploit but clever use of an intended feature (giving different items depending on the amount of uranium put in).
I understand that this poorly tested feature has brought a lot of money into the server. But this looks like an issue for the person who made this feature. if anything they should remove all that money from their own inventory for being so braindead.

Making people remove money, but not refunding the uranium that was put into the processor is very one-sided.
Especially for it happening because of an intended feature that was not tested properly

It's largely pathetic to see CM team handle a situation like this the way that they did. CM team seems to be so egotistical in the way that other people's opinions and explanations no longer matter. The uranium processor was made the way it was. It was [u]purposely[/u] made to give different items depending on how much uranium you put in. The issue that whoever coded said feature made it the way it is, and was not tested properly, should not be seen as an exploit but clever use of an intended feature (giving different items depending on the amount of uranium put in). I understand that this poorly tested feature has brought a lot of money into the server. But this looks like an issue for the person who made this feature. if anything they should remove all that money from their own inventory for being so braindead. Making people remove money, but not refunding the uranium that was put into the processor is very one-sided. Especially for it happening because of an intended feature that was not tested properly