Lewis_is_java wrote: yeah well people are able to stay on the platforms while inspiring the youth with equally as disgusting traits, let us not forget the KAM trend either
andrew tate in a sense was just that but for men and he didnt have google and Starbucks helping him out unlike Kill All Men (notice how both of these are disgusting yet only one is allowed in the "free marketplace of ideas" so it really makes you wonder what the end goal is for these large companies)

but in my honest opinion I think the media allowed him to get this big in the first place and even helped him in a sense as he was in everyones recommended, which is also why they banned him (gives more attention to him name) to trick kids into thinking he is the real deal and the only speaks the truth which is why he was censored (which is not true but that is what those who own the media want you these young kids to think) in order to give these kids a false perception of reality. But the reason why they would want kids to believe in someone like Andrew Tate, or on the other side Lizzo or generic progressive straight white male hater is A. for dividing a population (America) that shares a lot of the same values (not so much anymore but thats what you get with decades of manufactured divide and control) and B. to distract you from what really matters in life which is to really only worry about yourself and those in your community, and if you dont have a community it should be your job to build one and to strengthen those around you who truly care about you and vise versa. Nobody would care about Andrew Tate or any of this if they just focused on a much nicer world that is far away from any screen. but hey, life in the big city.

Also by doing this he was able to create a legal pyramid scheme that boosted his popularity even further

[quote="Lewis_is_java" post=1391318][quote="Lerpson" post=1391316][quote="Lewis_is_java" post=1391313][quote="Nafe" post=1391282]Andrew Tate has been banned off of Instagram and Facebook, apparently he violated their ‘dangerous organisations and individuals’ policy. Whilst I thought the memes about the guy were fucking annoying and[b] could tell most of what he was saying was satire[/b]. I see absolutely no reason anybody should be removed over what he was saying. I understand that Facebook, Twitter and all these social media conglomerates can do what they want with their platform, but it’s definitely not right. OPINIONS ZARP? :zarp:[/quote] Not everyone is too bright and the shit he is/was saying is outright just dangerous and retarded[/quote] idk what is dumber rn, your take or andrew tates "dangerous" takes the same can be said for millions of people who have any opinion ever, andrew tate says throw women out of the lambo that you can buy when you take his lessons, The View says slaughter your white neighbors in their front yards then then tell your 6 year old niece shes really a boy, who cares its all reactionary and courting controversy get over it![/quote] Not everyone who has an opinion has a massive audience or platform like he did have, my opinion isn't inspiring the next elliot rodger[/quote] yeah well people are able to stay on the platforms while inspiring the youth with equally as disgusting traits, let us not forget the KAM trend either andrew tate in a sense was just that but for men and he didnt have google and Starbucks helping him out unlike Kill All Men (notice how both of these are disgusting yet only one is allowed in the "free marketplace of ideas" so it really makes you wonder what the end goal is for these large companies) but in my honest opinion I think the media allowed him to get this big in the first place and even helped him in a sense as he was in everyones recommended, which is also why they banned him (gives more attention to him name) to trick kids into thinking he is the real deal and the only speaks the truth which is why he was censored (which is not true but that is what those who own the media want you these young kids to think) in order to give these kids a false perception of reality. But the reason why they would want kids to believe in someone like Andrew Tate, or on the other side Lizzo or generic progressive straight white male hater is A. for dividing a population (America) that shares a lot of the same values (not so much anymore but thats what you get with decades of manufactured divide and control) and B. to distract you from what really matters in life which is to really only worry about yourself and those in your community, and if you dont have a community it should be your job to build one and to strengthen those around you who truly care about you and vise versa. Nobody would care about Andrew Tate or any of this if they just focused on a much nicer world that is far away from any screen. but hey, life in the big city. Also by doing this he was able to create a legal pyramid scheme that boosted his popularity even further