Forum

Login to ZARP

View BBCode Back »

Joshua wrote:

Rule wrote:

Joshua wrote:

My view on this is that you were in inactivity, and it's my and LT's fault for not double-checking with regards to you being inactivity during the week your action was agreed upon. Coda sent you a messaging explaining this. It is, therefore, your responsibility to inform any LT or CM team member if you are going to be unavailable to complete your sanction duties, of which you failed to do

Wait for what? You just said its the LT's fault for not checking that she was on inactivity then said its her fault for essentially not telling coda she was going on inactivity? But told the whole LT, not just Coda???

Also, the situation in regards to racism shouldn't really be brought up. Sure its a big deal but thats why you gave her a sanction, she was not racist or discriminatory in the week of her sanction so clearly the only reason she was demoted was her inactivity, in which she has explained multiple times that she couldn't have played. If you were going to demote her for racism it would have been done the week of the sanction, not last week.

To be honest this situation was pretty poorly handled

Wait what? You just said it's the LT's fault for not checking that she was in inactivity then said it's her fault for essentially not telling coda she was going on inactivity? But telling the whole LT, not just Coda??? - No I stated that it was myself and the LT's fault that we did not check the OneNote correctly where it stated that MsRevine was on inactivity while she was away, per the demotions policy under sanctions it states that the person who got the sanction is the one responsible to inform any member of the LT Team and or Community team that she will not be able to complete her duties. MSRevine failed to do so, therefore, this resulted in the demotion.

With regards to MSRevines racist activity, she would of past for that week, but if MsRevine had messaged one of us, we would of very easily paused the sanction

Hold one where does it say that in the demotions policy? And even if that was there (since of course its common sense to tell if you are going on inactivity)...
Rule wrote:

she has explained multiple times that she couldn't have played

Revine had told you before the sanction was even given that she was going on inactivity so the sanction for activity shouldn't have even been given in the first place, or at the very least it should have been given following Revine's return from inactivity. No matter how this goes, its the LT's fault for not realizing she was going on inactivity not once, but twice, since she told you even before the sanction that she wouldn't be home.

BBCode

[quote="Joshua" post=1358706][quote="Rule" post=1358680][quote="Joshua" post=1358674]My view on this is that you were in inactivity, and it's my and LT's fault for not double-checking with regards to you being inactivity during the week your action was agreed upon. Coda sent you a messaging explaining this. It is, therefore, your responsibility to inform any LT or CM team member if you are going to be unavailable to complete your sanction duties, of which you failed to do[/quote]

Wait for what? You just said its the LT's fault for not checking that she was on inactivity then said its her fault for essentially not telling coda she was going on inactivity? But told the whole LT, not just Coda???

Also, the situation in regards to racism shouldn't really be brought up. Sure its a big deal but thats why you gave her a sanction, she was not racist or discriminatory in the week of her sanction so clearly the only reason she was demoted was her inactivity, in which she has explained multiple times that she couldn't have played. If you were going to demote her for racism it would have been done the week of the sanction, not last week.

To be honest this situation was pretty poorly handled[/quote]

[u][b]Wait what? You just said it's the LT's fault for not checking that she was in inactivity then said it's her fault for essentially not telling coda she was going on inactivity? But telling the whole LT, not just Coda??? [/b][/u]- No I stated that it was myself and the LT's fault that we did not check the OneNote correctly where it stated that MsRevine was on inactivity while she was away, per the demotions policy under sanctions it states that the person who got the sanction is the one responsible to inform any member of the LT Team and or Community team that she will not be able to complete her duties. MSRevine failed to do so, therefore,  this resulted in the demotion.

With regards to MSRevines racist activity, she would of past for that week, but if MsRevine had messaged one of us, we would of very easily paused the sanction[/quote]
Hold one where does it say that in the demotions policy? And even if that was there (since of course its common sense to tell if you are going on inactivity)...

[quote="Rule" post=1358680]she has explained multiple times that she couldn't have played[/quote]
Revine had told you before the sanction was even given that she was going on inactivity so the sanction for activity shouldn't have even been given in the first place, or at the very least it should have been given following Revine's return from inactivity. No matter how this goes, its the LT's fault for not realizing she was going on inactivity not once, but twice, since she told you even before the sanction that she wouldn't be home.

Forum

[MURDER] Demotion Appeal

View BBCode Back »

BBCode

Quick Menu

Menu

119 PLAYERS ONLINE

ZARP Discord & Steam Group