Verbal warnings that were received on a prior date should not affect a punishment where someone in the exact same situation was let off. Yeah ok he was told not to exploit but does that change anything about the fact that he was literally just having fun with lewis???? If the situation was fine (which it was according to lewis' appeal), pablo's prior verbals should not be relevant when no-one gave a shit about the exploiting apart from seggs who was sat spectating for some reason.