The problem isn't ignored there isn't a problem. Actions have consequences and if the owner of the gang is banned then the only way for them to preform these actions is to appeal their ban then they can do it. I will look at adding a co-owner rank, but in this case it wouldn't help because the person is already banned. We also gave banned people the ablity to do this by allowing them to reconnect while banned. So its only the worst offenders this effects. People who run a large gang that people have put a lot of work in shouldn't be doing things that will get them CM banned. If they do then you probably shouldn't be in a gang with that person...

The problem isn't ignored there isn't a problem. Actions have consequences and if the owner of the gang is banned then the only way for them to preform these actions is to appeal their ban then they can do it. I will look at adding a co-owner rank, but in this case it wouldn't help because the person is already banned. We also gave banned people the ablity to do this by allowing them to reconnect while banned. So its only the worst offenders this effects. People who run a large gang that people have put a lot of work in shouldn't be doing things that will get them CM banned. If they do then you probably shouldn't be in a gang with that person...