I agree, rdmers could 100% use this as an excuse for killing random players and getting away with it; as it is required that the 'victim' or the 'reported' has to provide video evidence; to proof if the 'victim' did in fact walk past an UNIDed body.
The only way i can tell if its a 100% BS excuse is if there are no UNIDed bodies on the map at the time. (by counting kills vs bodies found in the logs up until the report)
But what can you do about the problem?Make a system that logs when a player looks at an UNIDed body? Redefine the rule to include: "You must call out the UNIDed body in text chat, before killing the player who walked past it."?Redefine the rule to include: "You must have video evidence to kill a player who walked past an UNIDed body"?

:plussp: I agree, rdmers could 100% use this as an excuse for killing random players and getting away with it; as it is required that the 'victim' or the 'reported' has to provide video evidence; to proof if the 'victim' did in fact walk past an UNIDed body. The only way i can tell if its a 100% BS excuse is if there are no UNIDed bodies on the map at the time. (by counting kills vs bodies found in the logs up until the report) [color=#ffffff][size=1]But what can you do about the [i]problem[/i]?Make a system that logs when a player looks at an UNIDed body? Redefine the rule to include: "You must call out the UNIDed body in text chat, before killing the player who walked past it."?Redefine the rule to include: "You must have video evidence to kill a player who walked past an UNIDed body"?[/size][/color]