Kyber wrote:
I don't care about different scenarios. I'm talking about this one scenario.

The Festive Potato:
He was tested by detective and then called out KOS on a traitor. He was with a group of 4 people. The "new player" is not new but a TTT moderator.

We all make mistakes, but the precedence breeds ignorance. On his report on "An", I said "An" should be more careful in the future and maybe talked to if possible. Yet it was locked without being useful. In addition, no rule such as this very specific one suggested should be added - it's more common sense and alertness.

[quote="Kyber" post=1258241][quote="Studio Banter" post=1258238][quote="Kyber" post=1258237]The rule is you’re not allowed to ignore unidentified bodies, so if you didn’t try and go for them then someone who hasn’t seen that you’re proven may see that as a traitorous play[/quote] I could use your logic and then say that killing a confirmed innocent is traitor baiting and a traitorous play.[/quote] Yes, however there can always be a reason to kill them, [color=#00bb00]such as them shooting you first, which would mean you are not committing a traitorous act.[/color] [strike]Yes he shouldn’t be killed if he’s confirmed, but I’m saying if someone new joins and doesn’t understand you’re proven or they haven’t paid attention to the game and sees you commit a traitorous act then you could be killed for it.[/strike] [strike]Also by ‘confirmed twice’ I’m guessing this is from traitors as you would just say you have been tested innocent,[/strike] so if the person hadn’t been tested then your point would be invalid as there is still a shadow of a doubt that the person could be a traitor[/quote] I don't care about different scenarios. I'm talking about this one scenario. [b]The Festive Potato:[/b] [code] I got tested by a detective and was called out as innocent in chat. I called out a kos on a traitor who got killed and id'ed.[/code] He was tested by detective and then called out KOS on a traitor. He was with a group of 4 people. The "new player" is not new but a TTT moderator. We all make mistakes, but the precedence breeds ignorance. On his report on "An", I said "An" should be more careful in the future and maybe talked to if possible. Yet it was locked without being useful. In addition, no rule such as this very specific one suggested should be added - it's more common sense and alertness.