Exothermic362 wrote:
We have already talked about this, there is no point constantly appealing the same punishment. The outcome will be the same as before unless you have some amazing new evidence.
Why does he have to provide evidence? For a vote saying hes cheating shouldn't it be definitive? If there could be "some amazing new evidence" that cleared him of cheating why was it ever voted yes on.
Well I have to provide evidence to change their mind that I'm not hacking...I'm guessing... which on paper is logical... what is illogical is how you go about doing that. If i record a video like i did.. they will simply say ... "aw you toggled the hacks off" or something along does lines.... and if i can't use a video of me playing as evidence... what can I use than?