MICHAELL wrote:
In a way there has been a positive effect since they've been permabanned. The thing is, warnings don't prove as much as a perm would, and just warning them wouldn't have done the work the perm did. Everyone is aware of this now and I doubt it will happen again. I do agree that a perm is a long ban for what was done, but as I've said its shown everyone a lesson. Jusu's appeal has been accepted and lowered down to 2 weeks, the other people banned should have even less since Jusu had more on his rapsheet then they did.

I've spoken to Onion and said my thoughts.

[quote="MICHAELL" post=1226902][quote="Clarky" post=1226898]I think that everyone who has taken part in such malicious activities should be unbanned as they now know it is something they shouldn't do and is simply inexcusable if committed again, both sides are in the wrong here (both JH & PL members who have committed these actions) and they understand their mistakes. If such actions were done again, the ban should be replaced and not be considered so easily IMO.[/quote] in my opinion they should've never been banned in the first place, just warned and made clear that it's not allowed as it has never been done before.[/quote] In a way there has been a positive effect since they've been permabanned. The thing is, warnings don't prove as much as a perm would, and just warning them wouldn't have done the work the perm did. Everyone is aware of this now and I doubt it will happen again. I do agree that a perm is a long ban for what was done, but as I've said its shown everyone a lesson. Jusu's appeal has been accepted and lowered down to 2 weeks, the other people banned should have even less since Jusu had more on his rapsheet then they did. I've spoken to Onion and said my thoughts. :plussp: