MartinGaming wrote:
How does my argument make no sense. Cdm was disabled meaning no deaths can happen via a car? Thus allowing drivers to drive without car knowing they can not do harm to people how is it the players fault it does 1 armour point of damage. I do not understand how you can warn someone for driving down the road when the staff have done everything to remove the cars from effecting roleplay? Another example of this would be for you to warn me whenever you see me in a vehicle because I can assure you I have always hit at least one person everytime I have got in my car yet I have never been f1ed or warned for this so why now? Yes a cdm rule might be wrote down but effectively how can you enforce a rule that was 1) main purpose has been disabled and 2) show the intent of someone driving "recklessly" when 95% of players openly stand in roads meaning if you attempt to drive a vehicle you will hit someone.

My argument makes SENSE it's just you're too determined you are in the right when in fact this is the most amount of bullshit I have seen in a while when it comes to petty excuses to warn a user.

[quote="MartinGaming" post=1141208][quote="A Good Pianist" post=1141203][quote="MartinGaming" post=1141197][quote="A Good Pianist" post=1141189][quote="MartinGaming" post=1141185]I will just comment on this appeal, since I can't handle it: Since hitting people with your car deals "armor damage", it [b]still is against the rules[/b], as outlined in [b]rule 3.1[/b]. According to Jaffar, you've [b]continuosly[/b] used your vehicle with the [b]intention to hit other players[/b]. You have been [b]verbally warned multiple times[/b] leading up to your warning.[/quote] Lmao if its disabled it isn't his fault it does 1 armour damage every now and then. As for Intention i always intentionally hit people in my car since it was disabled and I've never faced punishment. Gtfo with ur bs excuses[/quote] You're completely missing the point. Just because CDM was "disabled" in the changelog doesen't mean it's not a thing anymore. It still deals "armor damage" and therefore is still a rule. It has never been removed from the rules. Additionally, as I have repeated multiple times now, Jaffar verbally warned him multiple times, before handing out an actual warning. These "bs excuses" are facts.[/quote] Armour damage isn't a valid kos reason so therefore IT DOESNT MATTER[/quote] Your argument both makes no sense and is not relevant to the situation, as kos reasons have nothing to do with the cdm rule...[/quote] How does my argument make no sense. Cdm was disabled meaning no deaths can happen via a car? Thus allowing drivers to drive without car knowing they can not do harm to people how is it the players fault it does 1 armour point of damage. I do not understand how you can warn someone for driving down the road when the staff have done everything to remove the cars from effecting roleplay? Another example of this would be for you to warn me whenever you see me in a vehicle because I can assure you I have always hit at least one person everytime I have got in my car yet I have never been f1ed or warned for this so why now? Yes a cdm rule might be wrote down but effectively how can you enforce a rule that was 1) main purpose has been disabled and 2) show the intent of someone driving "recklessly" when 95% of players openly stand in roads meaning if you attempt to drive a vehicle you will hit someone. My argument makes SENSE it's just you're too determined you are in the right when in fact this is the most amount of bullshit I have seen in a while when it comes to petty excuses to warn a user.