From what I've seen, your attitude when I reported you was quite poor; it was as if you were essentially gloating that I was wrong. Not only this, but in my eyes you had the intentions of breaking a rule but used a completely separate thing as an excuse to get out of punishment.
Really not too sure about this one chief, I want to see that attitude thing completely ironed out before I'd be comfortable with you as staff.
The scenario in question:
Your intentions behind killing me, in the report, were stated as: "You joined a gunfight, but I let it slide, but then you killed Kato so I figured you were a T"
This justification remained the same throughout the scenario, and this justification obviously isn't keeping within the rules, as by killing me based on the death of Kato, you are killing me without giving ample time to identify the body. This would be considered as a breach of rule 2.5 Player vs Player:
If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identify the body/the round ends/you question them.
In addition to this, you have 2 recent punishments, so I don't really think your understanding of the rules is sound enough for a staff candidate. Give it some time and you have a good chance, but I don't see this being your week.