You can know someone is a Traitor but not have proof for it , i therefor called him a traitor and specified that there was NO kos since i didnt have a valid reason to do so. If he did get rdm'd because of me calling him a T, then he could have reported me even if I clearly stated "no kos". I don't see how this is favouritism in any way. There was no rule breaking...

You can know someone is a Traitor but not have proof for it , i therefor called him a traitor and specified that there was NO kos since i didnt have a valid reason to do so. If he did get rdm'd because of me calling him a T, then he could have reported me even if I clearly stated "no kos". I don't see how this is favouritism in any way. There was no rule breaking...