Based off of your proof and Jamie's proof. If I was a user and watched only one side, the reason you were punished and it's validitiy changes massively. The thing is, I spoke to Jamie and he's sent me proof of him asking you guys to stop twice prior to your clip. One time being generally and the other time being personally, by freezing you and speaking to you.

Eddie mentioned about the Ethos and speaking to a user about punishing people when what they did is minor, which is definitely correct and based off of your proof I would definitely agree that you shouldn't have been warned, but it trails back again to the fact that you didn't show the other two times; showing you did indeed have an effect on other players, by shaking the map a bunch and being distruptive to others doing so.

If you want to see why I decided to deny this appeal then you can watch Jamie's proof and see that it is fairly valid, the fact you were changing your "abuse" every time, doesn't help your case either.

plays.tv/video/5d0eabc340153ee35a/blueperson-prop-minging