Vince wrote:
Your replies have been very constructive in this thread, yes, but in my previous thread they most definitely were not. Your replies included "Shit answer". What? You can't turn water into wine? Well that's my hopes of applying to be Jesus down the drain. Listen, Scottie, I know you're a well respected member of the community, but there's no need to totally slate my application.
You have to be fair with me on this one. You agreed, twice, that your 150 word answers were pretty much nothing. You saw this issue and you told me you felt the same way. Don't blame me when this leads me to the verdict your application is a little weak.
Vince wrote:
At least I tried to apply and earn my position instead of just donating, I gave it a go. I could have just left it as a donation and kept it that way. Anyway, I am not going to argue with you any further.
Well I am sorry but, what are you suggesting? A medal? Some respect for something a million members could have done? You gave it a go, perhaps better next time. You forgot to calculate in that you are not allowed to apply within 1 week of your previous attempt. And your app genuinely wasn't that good. You thought the same way so it is a bit unfair to judge now.
Vince wrote:
If you all agree with Scottie's -Support then please feel free to post with reasons. However, please, do not feel afraid to say +Support just because Scottie has -Supported my application, please base it on the application itself.
Your application is illegible for reviewing, as it hasn't been 1 week since your last one.