CeeZee wrote:
LonelyDodo wrote:
Kurzex wrote:
Owl,
Can you take this piece of advice?
Let them say what they want to say. Its feedback and that's there to help you. Don't lash out as you are doing right now. It's bad for your reform
I think this is a good advice in a way as it helps Owl get the rank, but a staff member shouldnt imho be giving advices on how to decieve the staff team. How I see is that your comment helps him hide his flaws rather than embrace them and improve on them.
When put under a microscope every time you apply can be a bit infuriating, and considering one of his shitposts (if the context is correct that is) has been taken seriously like he has actually offended people, I think he has some grounds to be pissed off a little.
As someone who always wants to have honest criticism, it has to be valid otherwise you might as well be called Katje and just write some nonsense. Most people here have not actually encountered him when he was a minge, but are simply piggybacking off of others opinions instead of making their own.
I am in no way saying "let's accept him and see how he does!" I am saying however, maybe take the spotlight and microscope off of him and see how he performs in game for a 1-3 weeks instead of judging every minor detail about every sentence or every word even he says. Would you rather him not say a word to get staff and AFK play or would you rather have a mod that's active in the community and talks to their players?
Of course he did things bad in the past, but how is he supposed to rectify that if people keep poking him until he snaps then going "lol see same old owl" why don't we just stop poking him for a while?
In the short time I spoke to him in game a week ago when we were both online, he seemed pretty funny and had a good sense of humour, broke no rules and had fun with other members, maybe it's because I wasn't looking for a reason to dislike him and he didn't have to worry?
You are saying that he has right to commit childish outlashes because he is under investigation that he submitted on himself? Whenever you apply for staff or appeal a punishment you and your actions are put under microscope which is done to vet whether or not the candidate is up for the job. This is right due process to everyone but TheFierceOwl righto?
FierceOwl has gotten honest critique from me and Miia for like 15 months now and has yet to improve anything and proves me right every time I open his application and read the comments. There are 2 possible explanations for this and im betting its the one that has "FierceOwl has never changed".
I dont mind taking the spotlight off of him but this literally means he cannot apply for the time you want him not to be under the microscope. What comes to staff preferences I want friendly and active staff not staff members who abuse other staff members and their trust in him.
He could do what every other staff member does when faced with negative feedback. Either accept it or argue with it, but he just has a huge outburst of aggression towards the one with negatuve feedback.
And I am the staff member who got him into staff team the last tine, emergency demoted him, and discovered him ban evading. Needless to say I have been open minded about him and he has managed to dissapoint me time after time
I tried to reply in each of your paragraphs on their own so reading them one by one should make more sense