That's what's confusing to me. I'm not saying CeeZee is wrong. What proof do you want me to add? What is required is already in the post.
Again, I don't need proof. It's good to have. just not needed. But let's say I didn't provide a narrative. Go with what CeeZee said. In his own narrative, I'm still innocent.

Yikes Svanz Comet wrote: Clearly not in this case.

Both of them Were KOSed. That doesn't nullify anything, it makes them both KOSed, which they were, which I said many times in my posts. And nowhere in the rules does it say it "nullifies it". The meta is calling a KOS on the person you're shooting, be you traitor or innocent. It gives you an advantage in either case.


It's not. Read the post before commenting, simple as that. I don't mean to be rude. You just argue against me without knowing the situation. Blindly attacking. And because you don't even know the situation and (by definition, not out of spite) are completely ignorant and will willingly continue to be ignorant, your comments are entirely (again, by definition not out of spite) are irrelevant.

[quote]Implying that the template restricts what you can and cannot put into an appeal... there's an extra information field that you can put your evidence in. Don't worry, you won't get punished for putting it in there ;) [/quote] That's what's confusing to me. I'm not saying CeeZee is wrong. What proof do you want me to add? What is required is already in the post. [quote][quote="Yikes Svanz Comet" post=1101579]Also what do you mean I don't have proof?[/quote] I mean you don't have proof. You've not submitted any screenshots/videos that detail what actually happened. You've simply provided a narrative of what happened, which takes me onto my next point...[/quote] Again, I don't [b] need[/b] proof. It's good to have. just not needed. But let's say I didn't provide a narrative. Go with what CeeZee said. In his own narrative, I'm still innocent. [quote="Yikes Svanz Comet" post=1101579] If you said that admins word is taken already, a very bias thing but nonetheless, then at least stick to it and actually listen to what CeeZee said himself. He got KOSed. I killed him on a KOS. 2+2. I didn't RDM. [/quote] [quote]That's been the default outcome since I joined back in 2016, it's never changed? The assumption is that the staff member knows what they're doing however, if it's obviously wrong and is pointed out by the handling admin it can be addressed. Yes, CeeZee was KOSed, but so was the bloke he was shooting at. You killed CeeZee, who was KOSed, who was attempting to kill another KOSed player as he was killed. Since both parties were KOSed, it almost nullifies the whole point of him being KOSed since he was attempting to kill another KOSed player - that's my understanding anyway.[/quote] Clearly not in this case. Both of them Were KOSed. That doesn't nullify anything, it makes them both KOSed, which they were, which I said many times in my posts. And nowhere in the rules does it say it "nullifies it". The meta is calling a KOS on the person you're shooting, be you traitor or innocent. It gives you an advantage in either case. [quote][quote="Yikes Svanz Comet" post=1101579] Stories don't match, he says. Please, don't comment on posts you can't be fucked to read, for the 3rd time. I never said CeeZee was lying in any case, I said Richard was. Your comments are more than irrelevant. [/quote] Rude[/quote] It's not. Read the post before commenting, simple as that. I don't mean to be rude. You just argue against me without knowing the situation. Blindly attacking. And because you don't even know the situation and (by definition, not out of spite) are completely ignorant and will willingly continue to be ignorant, your comments are entirely (again, by definition not out of spite) are irrelevant.