.uzi wrote:
You're wrong. As mentioned in my post that you clearly didn't read, this community runs on the idea of innocent until proven guilty. The one needing to provide proof, in this case, would be CeeZee as he's the claimant in this. Not me. I'd need to provide proof if I was making a ban appeal however. You as a global moderator should know about this, I'm making a punishment appeal of which isn't required to show proof, despite the fact that I did show proof for me not RDMing. Ban template has a proof section. Punishment appeal template doesn't. I'm actually shocked you, a global moderator, don't know this.

Also what do you mean I don't have proof? If you said that admins word is taken already, a very bias thing but nonetheless, then at least stick to it and actually listen to what CeeZee said himself. He got KOSed. I killed him on a KOS. 2+2. I didn't RDM.

Stories don't match, he says. Please, don't comment on posts you can't be fucked to read, for the 3rd time. I never said CeeZee was lying in any case, I said Richard was. Your comments are more than irrelevant.

[quote=".uzi" post=1101576][quote="Yikes Svanz Comet" post=1101573][quote=".uzi" post=1101571]But you got any proof of you not joining a gunfight tho? It's your word against his and by default, the admin's side is taken.[/quote] Funny. This is exactly what my post is about. Staff not reading.[/quote] I read your last appeal so I know what this is already about and you haven't provided any evidence on both cases. Appeal handling policy dictates that evidence is required to [b]prove[/b] that you did infact not break a rule. How do you expect staff to make any informed decision that would involve removing/adjusting a punishment without [b]any[/b] evidence being supplied? If it's word vs. word when handling an appeal, and unless it's blatantly obvious the punishment was unnecessary or abusive in any regard, there's no reason to adjust it. In this case, Richard has appropriately contacted CeeZee, the admin who served the punishment and got his side of the story after consulting your appeal and the associated narrative. Stories don't match, details are missing blah blah blah.. point is, you can't prove CeeZee is lying here since you have no proof so why should we take your word?[/quote] You're wrong. As mentioned in my post [i]that you clearly didn't read[/i], this community runs on the idea of [b]innocent until proven guilty[/b]. The one needing to provide proof, in this case, would be CeeZee as he's the claimant in this. Not me. I'd need to provide proof if I was making a ban appeal however.[b] You as a global moderator should know about this[/b], I'm making a punishment appeal of which isn't required to show proof, despite the fact that I did show proof for me not RDMing. Ban template has a proof section. Punishment appeal template doesn't. [b]I'm actually shocked you, a global moderator[/b], don't know this. Also what do you mean I don't have proof? If you said that admins word is taken already, a very bias thing but nonetheless, then at least stick to it and actually listen to what CeeZee said himself. He got KOSed. I killed him on a KOS. 2+2. I didn't RDM. Stories don't match, he says. Please, don't comment on posts you can't be fucked to read, for the 3rd time. I never said CeeZee was lying in any case, I said Richard was. Your comments are more than irrelevant.