Yikes Svanz Comet wrote: I read your last appeal so I know what this is already about and you haven't provided any evidence on both cases.

Appeal handling policy dictates that evidence is required to prove that you did infact not break a rule. How do you expect staff to make any informed decision that would involve removing/adjusting a punishment without any evidence being supplied? If it's word vs. word when handling an appeal, and unless it's blatantly obvious the punishment was unnecessary or abusive in any regard, there's no reason to adjust it.

In this case, Richard has appropriately contacted CeeZee, the admin who served the punishment and got his side of the story after consulting your appeal and the associated narrative. Stories don't match, details are missing blah blah blah.. point is, you can't prove CeeZee is lying here since you have no proof so why should we take your word?

Also I ain't staff on TTT anymore :^)

[quote="Yikes Svanz Comet" post=1101573][quote=".uzi" post=1101571]But you got any proof of you not joining a gunfight tho? It's your word against his and by default, the admin's side is taken.[/quote] Funny. This is exactly what my post is about. Staff not reading.[/quote] I read your last appeal so I know what this is already about and you haven't provided any evidence on both cases. Appeal handling policy dictates that evidence is required to [b]prove[/b] that you did infact not break a rule. How do you expect staff to make any informed decision that would involve removing/adjusting a punishment without [b]any[/b] evidence being supplied? If it's word vs. word when handling an appeal, and unless it's blatantly obvious the punishment was unnecessary or abusive in any regard, there's no reason to adjust it. In this case, Richard has appropriately contacted CeeZee, the admin who served the punishment and got his side of the story after consulting your appeal and the associated narrative. Stories don't match, details are missing blah blah blah.. point is, you can't prove CeeZee is lying here since you have no proof so why should we take your word? Also I ain't staff on TTT anymore :^)