Z Rex wrote: the idea is that in 99% of cases you'd need proof to prove fault to get a warn removed unless the staff member is blatantly at fault or they just admit fault, which i'm going to assume didn't happen as i'm assuming tama will have contacted him because he knows his shit

[quote="Z Rex" post=1057894][quote="Eddie." post=1057890][quote="sorIe" post=1057889]"denied by low educatrd staff" when will you stop being a stuck up cunt who tries to feign intelligence to no avail[/quote] clearly the staff member is uneducated because no evidence was supplied to back the story :?[/quote] This is not an demotion request for me to have proof. This is a topic about me getting warned with no explenation what so ever, last time i did it the warning got removed. So id like to know what i did wrong and why he did not make sit before warning me.[/quote] the idea is that in 99% of cases you'd need proof to prove fault to get a warn removed unless the staff member is blatantly at fault or they just admit fault, which i'm going to assume didn't happen as i'm assuming tama will have contacted him because he knows his shit