Kyber wrote:
House wrote:
CeeZee wrote:
Do you have any proof of these claims?
Who the fuck cares? He was correct so you can’t punish him as you have no proof he did the method incorrectly, he found two traitors legitimately and you can’t slay him for using logic
Proof doesnt matter anymore they just added a rule that can only be enforced by guessing someones intent and Head Admins say it should be guilty until proven innocent.
Head Admin-"Many people say "I recorded that in a report" to try and make the victim forgive or to make the staff member wait long enough to forget it. So to prevent that they warn untill you give them the counter proof."
Jesus, punishing someone for using logic with no proof that they did the method incorrectly is genius!