jack bushrsos wrote:
LuciouS wrote:
So you do admit to it being a valid warn but you feel as if the warning was harsh and unneeded?
I do feel that the warning was uneeded. Considering Micky did the same thing and he didn't warn Micky. The fact I was still building he could of just showed the rule. I argued my point the smallest and was given the reply something along the lines "it happened to me it should happen to you"
Also for someone who also has never had any warnings for prop abuse or breaking building rules (i think at least)
#1 The punishment is valid and you were denying to remove the props after i told you to do so 10 times.
#2 Micky didn't get warned because he had no recents.
#3 I've never said that you should be warned because i was warned in the past. I said this:
Dr Richard: Lol wwait to see my rapsheet
Dr Richard: I got o many warns about this
So instead of slandering me and spreading some information that you made up, why don't you just admit to what you have done. And fix your attitude as well...
I was simply doing my job.
EDIT - Also, i would like a CM to check the logs and tell me where i wrote something like this in chat.
jack bushrsos wrote:
Richard replied with "I had bad experiences when i joined and warned for bs reasons so you should to."
Slandering your name? As i said "something along those lines" Thats not slander. As for asking me to remove 10 times, That is infact a lie. I asked to see the rule. and you kept saying the number. I then replied with thats not a rule thats number because i couldn't see the motd at the time. As soon as you showed the rule, you removed the props on your own. Then instantly warned me.
As for the micky part you removed his props multiple times before even freezing him. So you can not say he listened to you first time. because he didn't.