|
Login to ZARP
|
View BBCode Back »
AlphaLyle wrote:
Alright, then you'll notice that the first ban was on the 4th of last month. The second one was from the 22nd of last month. That's more than 2 weeks from the first one. And the last one was from yesterday, a full month from the second one. So basically your argument is invalid and doesn't pertain at all to what I was saying. Recents stay recent for 2 weeks if I remember correctly. Thanks for trying though.
Edit: my logic of doubling is based on if the ban was "recent" so you basically look like a fool right now because you obviously didn't read what I said at all.
TheCorgi wrote:
Yes
AlphaLyle wrote:
Did you even look at the time stamps for those bans?
TheCorgi wrote:
Well, you did say that admins should slowly double the ban length if they repeatedly break the same offences, which he did.
AlphaLyle wrote:
Well I think the first one is still excessive. But again, I don't have any background info on that. The second one shouldn't have minimal intention to RP since you can't really punish for that. The other two I consider warnings, so really, he would only have 7 recents. A week max at that. The first one should still be a week max depending on what the situation is or if he had recent bans. What are you all not understanding about me saying that?
TheCorgi wrote:
Not taking any sides but based on your logic:
STEAM_0:1:426739601 punished by Richard Woodfield (STEAM_0:0:79280795). Banned on 22/09/2018 - 17:25:28 for 2 week(s) with reason 7 Recent Punishments + RDM + Lying To Staff
STEAM_0:1:426739601 punished by Dr Richard (STEAM_0:0:79280795). Updated Ban on 23/10/2018 - 18:13:26 for 2 week(s) with reason 5 Recent Punishements + Ignoring Sit + Constantly Rule Breaking [Mass RDM] - Minimal intention to RP
He did the exact same length.
Dr Richard wrote:
A 1 month ban should only be given if there are recent bans included on the rapsheet. You begin at a few days and work your way up to the month. That's what the ethos is about. Fair and equal treatment. If someone comes back a ban of 5 recent punishments of Mass RDM, then you double the ban length. If they do it again, you do it again. You can't just automatically give someone a month long ban because they have say 5 recents all pertaining to Mass RDM. They should have been banned 2-3 punishments ago, but this is hypothetical.
Richard how about you tell us if he had a recent ban (or just tell us your side of the story) rather than tiptoeing around it and trying to meme your demote request. Like c'mon.
dankek wrote:
That's what i was about to write, you read my mind...
You don't know the rap sheet of the user who got banned, you don't know his attitude, you don't know what he has done up until that point, you don't know what he said to warrant such a long ban in the first place. Mass RDMing with multiple punishments on your rapsheet, even more so if there are multiple recent Mass RDM punishments can easily warrant a one month ban.
That's what i was about to write, you read my mind...
A 1 month ban should only be given if there are recent bans included on the rapsheet. You begin at a few days and work your way up to the month. That's what the ethos is about. Fair and equal treatment. If someone comes back a ban of 5 recent punishments of Mass RDM, then you double the ban length. If they do it again, you do it again. You can't just automatically give someone a month long ban because they have say 5 recents all pertaining to Mass RDM. They should have been banned 2-3 punishments ago, but this is hypothetical.
Richard how about you tell us if he had a recent ban (or just tell us your side of the story) rather than tiptoeing around it and trying to meme your demote request. Like c'mon.
Not taking any sides but based on your logic:
STEAM_0:1:426739601 punished by Richard Woodfield (STEAM_0:0:79280795). Banned on 22/09/2018 - 17:25:28 for 2 week(s) with reason 7 Recent Punishments + RDM + Lying To Staff
STEAM_0:1:426739601 punished by Dr Richard (STEAM_0:0:79280795). Updated Ban on 23/10/2018 - 18:13:26 for 2 week(s) with reason 5 Recent Punishements + Ignoring Sit + Constantly Rule Breaking [Mass RDM] - Minimal intention to RP
He did the exact same length.
Well I think the first one is still excessive. But again, I don't have any background info on that. The second one shouldn't have minimal intention to RP since you can't really punish for that. The other two I consider warnings, so really, he would only have 7 recents. A week max at that. The first one should still be a week max depending on what the situation is or if he had recent bans. What are you all not understanding about me saying that?
Well, you did say that admins should slowly double the ban length if they repeatedly break the same offences, which he did.
Did you even look at the time stamps for those bans?
Yes
Alright, then you'll notice that the first ban was on the 4th of last month. The second one was from the 22nd of last month. That's more than 2 weeks from the first one. And the last one was from yesterday, a full month from the second one. So basically your argument is invalid and doesn't pertain at all to what I was saying. Recents stay recent for 2 weeks if I remember correctly. Thanks for trying though.
Edit: my logic of doubling is based on if the ban was "recent" so you basically look like a fool right now because you obviously didn't read what I said at all.
BBCode
287 PLAYERS ONLINE
DarkRP
16/127
Online
Deathrun
0/40
Online
TTT
0/47
Online
Bhop
0/32
Online
Surf
0/32
Online
Prop Hunt
0/42
Online
Sandbox
0/42
Online
Discord
271/962
Online