Forum

Login to ZARP

View BBCode Back »

Orion wrote:

Miia wrote:

Orion wrote:

Harry declared an invalid KOS on Prestige, as I've already pointed out and as I pointed out before you shut down the discussion. EDIT: The body was also identified before I shot Harry.

But in that situation a traitor could see that Harry called a false KOS, kill Harry and then be unable to be killed for it. Despite committing a traitorous act he becomes untouchable and protected by the rules.

Yes, that's a risk when innocents RDM other innocents. Harry committed a treasonous offense, so I killed him, as is my right within the confines of the rules. You're saying that all that matters is the outcome, and the context is irrelevant. You're saying that you need to know in advance whether or not someone is an innocent or a traitor, before you can kill them for committing actions that validate KOS's in the first place.

The logic you used to kill Harry would be the same logic i would apply to kill you for killing him. You cannot possible know whether the innocent that Harry KOSed had committed a traitorous act, if he had it would have given Harry a valid reason to KOS them. So despite Harry having a perfectly valid reason to KOS that innocent you still killed him. You did basically the same thing you are arguing should be RDM.

BBCode

[quote="Orion" post=1029256][quote="Miia" post=1029251][quote="Orion" post=1029243]Harry declared an invalid KOS on Prestige, as I've already pointed out and as I pointed out before you shut down the discussion. EDIT: The body was also identified before I shot Harry.[/quote]
But in that situation a traitor could see that Harry called a false KOS, kill Harry and then be unable to be killed for it. Despite committing a traitorous act he becomes untouchable and protected by the rules.[/quote]

Yes, that's a risk when innocents RDM other innocents. Harry committed a treasonous offense, so I killed him, as is my right within the confines of the rules. You're saying that all that matters is the outcome, and the context is irrelevant. You're saying that you need to know in advance whether or not someone is an innocent or a traitor, before you can kill them for committing actions that validate KOS's in the first place.[/quote]
The logic you used to kill Harry would be the same logic i would apply to kill you for killing him. You cannot possible know whether the innocent that Harry KOSed had committed a traitorous act, if he had it would have given Harry a valid reason to KOS them. So despite Harry having a perfectly valid reason to KOS that innocent you still killed him. You did basically the same thing you are arguing should be RDM.

Forum

RDM or not?

View BBCode Back »

BBCode

Quick Menu

Menu

160 PLAYERS ONLINE

ZARP Discord & Steam Group