dingofetch wrote:
Jax wrote:
dingofetch wrote:
Jax wrote:
Lets just remember this is ONE punishment. Denying him for ONE punishment when we have accepted people with 2+ (eg me when i first applied wayyy back) so plz just stop arguing against ceezee for having ONE punishment lmao.
I'm not saying to deny him, as previously stated I just want to see him work up to it in the moderator position. I am clearly not the only one who feels this way and I think it's completely reasonable given everything that's happened so far.
It does not look clear to me as everyone in this appears to be against you. Not with you. I know you punished him and want to defend your actions which i understand but you have gotta understand too that yes there is a 0 tolerance rule but there is sticking to what is actually right too. I disrespected other staff members and got an official for it a few months ago meanwhile you are saying for ceezee to work for longer when he has being gone for longer than a YEAR. Just take that in.
Yes, CeeZee has been gone for a year, came back, and was confused on the rules. Am I wrong to think that someone who doesn't know the updated rules should take a little longer to get used to them before applying straight for admin?
Me wondering why I got warned for RACISM when saying something in a non racist manor, in a non racist setting, in a non racist context, for saying 1 word, that wasn't a hard R or anything, that everyone with more than 3 active braincells has agreed that I should have received a verbal warning about what I said, nothing close to a warn and a mute
Is me not knowing the rules?
You realise I got permission to apply straight for admin from 2 HA's for a reason right? If I was as dumb as you're putting on you really think they would give me their permission?
If 2 of my buddies were HA's I'm sure I'd get the same treatment, and I don't appreciate the 3 active braincells comment. If you really think you are deserving of the position, what is wrong with starting off as a moderator and proving to those of us that doubt you that we were wrong?