sorIe wrote:
dingofetch wrote:
Recently the policy changed and I was brought aside to talk about me being too lenient and not banning for second offense racism because I thought the user didn't mean to do it. While I personally have stated that I do not think it is right, as a staff member, while it is still a rule I will enforce it. I'm sorry you can't wrap your head around following orders I'm given, but that's what staff members are supposed to do.
Seems like you're applying a completely different situation to everything regarding racism and not actually considering the context of Miia's talk with you. With 2 warns in the past hour, a third incident of racism most definitely calls for a ban, and once again your basic interpretation and judgement skills are clouded and completely at fault.
To be clear, it wasn't clouded judgement on my part, I was told instead of warning and gagging the guy who was unintentionally racist, I was supposed to ban him because it was his second offense. If he had only been talked to by a staff member the first time, I wouldn't have known it was his second offense at all and the situation that normally would result in a ban, wouldn't have. If a user breaks a rule they should be punished for it, especially if they are someone who has been around a long time. My warn and gag on CeeZee was a fitting punishment according to the standards I was recently told to go by.
excuse me good sir but there is something called context and if you are literally taking something out of context to ban someone then you shouldnt be doing it. From what i gather, Ceezee used it in context so not only do you gag him, but you warn him as well? It's a stretch for a gag but a warn as well is just over the top. If you're punishing for things that you cherry pick from context and simply don't verbally warn someone then you need to rethink your punishments. There's freedom of punishment and you don't have to blindly follow everything that you are said, as ethos are a thing.