Kyber wrote: In my opinion,2 weeks is not that long to not use an official warning against someone. Especially one that isn't about inactivity. The fact they even got an official in the first place shows they were not doing their job correctly and need to earn back the trust lost. 2 weeks, in my personal opinion, doesn't cut it. I think 3-4 weeks is a good timespan.

[quote="Kyber" post=1018107][quote="Eddie." post=1017950][quote="Kyber" post=1017897][quote="Harry RDM Squatta" post=1017894]You have an Offical for rdming also you just resigned from TTT :minussp:[/quote] Which he did so because you had an extremely poor attitude against him and are using an official from 3 weeks ago against him. IMO he should be able to revoke but hey ho[/quote] imo, 3 weeks is still more than recent for an official, I actually used to think officials were permenant and never expired[/quote] I mean it's personal preference to everyone. I don't like to use official over two weeks unless its an inactivity official which I think should be used for up to 3-4 weeks. Officials are permanent it's just whether or not you feel they should be used against someone.[/quote] In my opinion,2 weeks is not that long to not use an official warning against someone. Especially one that isn't about inactivity. The fact they even got an official in the first place shows they were not doing their job correctly and need to earn back the trust lost. 2 weeks, in my personal opinion, doesn't cut it. I think 3-4 weeks is a good timespan.