Login to ZARP





View BBCode Back »

Studio Banter wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
BDnico17 wrote:
dankek wrote:
BDnico17 wrote:
dankek wrote:
BDnico17 wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
BDnico17 wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
BDnico17 wrote:
alexsander2k wrote:
BDnico17 wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
BDnico17 wrote:
alexsander2k wrote:
Eddie. wrote:
Let me just point out, I know ELT very well and I know he does not have a bad attitude often, infact I’ve never seen it. Nor is he usually toxic in anyway, he’s by far my favourite staff member. I’m not saying his attitude in the video is correct, but it’s not a continuous thing and does not usually happen. Everyone can get annoyed and show a bad attitude at times, I’ve done it before. But as long as he is talked to about this, I am sure it would never happen again.

As for the report, I don’t see any way he could’ve reactivated the trap.
ill be fully fine if he got a talking to (prob gonna be the outcome if it gets accepted) but they are at the moment to us seems like they are doing everything in their power to get this denied as they think we faked it which we didn't but because the server doesn't actually log button presses on the server itself only to the staff on the server by how they are trying to blame us for being mingy on the server when that hasn't even anything nearly to do with this situation because the report is about a rule break and that horrible attitude thats shown after this

I, personally, would deny this right now and talk to him regarding his attitude, as you said above. To be fair I already did. However, I can’t habdle, so I guess Kai will do it
If you talk to him about his attitude (something he did wrong) then the report should be accepted because the staff member did something wrong? :thinking:

The report was issued upon reactivation, even if it were to be posible (which lemon proves probably isn’t) the video alone can not act as proof. This means the report would be denied (if I handled) but I would talk to him to clarify the attitude thing
still it would be accepted in a way because the staff member is still receiving a kind of punishment so i

Well kinda accepted, but still no severe punishment, and not even for the reason given. Just an explanation / clarification
Even if he broke the rule I highly doubt he would get anything more than a slap on the wrist so I don't understand why you use "severe punishment" as if it would actually be severe.

In spite of what you say we don’t punish rule break
Either you have no idea what you just said or you just contradicted yourself. You talk about a severe punishment and then you say no punishment would be given at all?

I am not talking about this particular case, but it seems you say we don’t punish our own staff
didn't you just say you wouldn't punish for a rulebreak, lol?

No, lol?

And this is getting too off topic, let’s leave the request to be handled
[color=#0000Ff]In spite of what you say we don’t punish rule break[/color][/quote]
wotz the fk
I'll leave this at that

I was asking what made him think we didn’t punish rule breakers
I don't see a question mark

wow I can't see who says what, this is so frustrating!

zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/server-is...s-quotation-guidance
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/server-is...s-quotation-guidance
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/server-is...s-quotation-guidance
advertising at it's finest

BBCode


Time to create page: 0.064 seconds

202 PLAYERS ONLINE

Connect to server View Gametracker DarkRP 1
0/127
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Deathrun
0/40
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker TTT
0/47
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Bhop
0/32
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Surf
0/32
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Prop Hunt
0/42
Online
Connect to server View Gametracker Sandbox
0/42
Online
Connect to server Discord
202/1024
Online
Top