Ok first just because you do not believe that his friend was not AFK does not mean you have any proof of it, if no evidence is provided that shows otherwise i will always take the side that would not result in a punishment. "Regardless of Pookie moving or not in the game should have no reason to make my KOS on him invalid.", im sorry but this would make your KOS invalid, if like he said he had been with his AFK friend the entire round then he could not have committed a traitorous act meaning you had no valid reason to KOS him. So he was well within his rights to kill you for that. As for their ghosting it had zero impact on the game as you were killed for a perfectly valid reason which was explained to you, as it had such a low impact on the game i felt it was not necessary to punish and decided to just make it clear to them not to reveal any information that may effect the outcome of the game in the future.

Ok first just because you do not believe that his friend was not AFK does not mean you have any proof of it, if no evidence is provided that shows otherwise i will always take the side that would not result in a punishment. "Regardless of Pookie moving or not in the game should have no reason to make my KOS on him invalid.", im sorry but this would make your KOS invalid, if like he said he had been with his AFK friend the entire round then he could not have committed a traitorous act meaning you had no valid reason to KOS him. So he was well within his rights to kill you for that. As for their ghosting it had zero impact on the game as you were killed for a perfectly valid reason which was explained to you, as it had such a low impact on the game i felt it was not necessary to punish and decided to just make it clear to them not to reveal any information that may effect the outcome of the game in the future.