Forum

Login to ZARP

View BBCode Back »

loxeo wrote:

dankek wrote:

How is it common sense, when people play for first to 1 as well as other gamemodes? I personally never bo3 because I don't like the chances, where is this standard you people are pulling from? Raeker also pulled the statement he made because he also believes in (fundementally) the same argument I'm making about the bo3.Also, if it's "common sense" why haven't you found an argument that strikes down mine? I'm seriously not buying this.
Oh, also, somebody's word out of context isn't law. Just an fyi.

Because that's how it works.

Example rules: "/roll 100, high win, 10m vs 10m - agree?"
The first role would determine the outcome. Not sure how I can explain this to you if you can't accept it, but have Raeker explain it for you too,
[DISREGARDING CONTEXT]

[DISREGARDING CONTEXT]
This is a general statement.

The issue that I have with this report is that Jawson rolled three times. That makes it seem as if he was well aware of the rules that they actually agreed upon (according to FawDaw they also mentioned ft3 in voice chat) and that he, after the initial rolls, decided that he wanted to fall back on another strategy where this would actually be ft1. That makes no sense though, as he already rolled three times.

BBCode

[quote="loxeo" post=977196][quote="dankek" post=977185]
How is it common sense, when people play for first to 1 as well as other gamemodes? I personally never bo3 because I don't like the chances, where is this standard you people are pulling from? Raeker also pulled the statement he made because he also believes in (fundementally) the same argument I'm making about the bo3.Also, if it's "common sense" why haven't you found an argument that strikes down mine? I'm [b]seriously[/b] not buying this.
Oh, also, somebody's word out of context isn't law. Just an fyi.[/quote]

Because that's how it works.

Example rules: "/roll 100, high win, 10m vs 10m - agree?"
The first role would determine the outcome. Not sure how I can explain this to you if you can't accept it, but have Raeker explain it for you too, 
[b][u][DISREGARDING CONTEXT][/u][/b]
[img size=400]https://i.imgur.com/VEftqee.png[/img]
[b][u][DISREGARDING CONTEXT][/u][/b]
This is a general statement.[/quote]
The issue that I have with this report is that Jawson rolled three times. That makes it seem as if he was well aware of the rules that they actually agreed upon (according to FawDaw they also mentioned ft3 in voice chat) and that he, after the initial rolls, decided that he wanted to fall back on another strategy where this would actually be ft1. That makes no sense though, as he already rolled three times.

Forum

[SSRP] Ban Request - Fawdaw

Time to create page: 0.074 seconds