Jawson wrote: DICLAIMER: I CAN'T BLOODY READ THE NAMES AND WHO POSTS WHAT, SO I'M JUST GUESSING AFTER A POINT IN THE SCREENSHOT
You see, he didn't try to trick you, the guy could've honestly missed to write that rule, and you both sort of unexplicitly understood that and continued to roll three times. Neither of you froze and looked back and said "oh look, hey it's bo1 so pay up". Bo1 wasn't explicitly stated and you both understood it was bo3 still, and continued to roll.
Like I said, this looks like a misunderstanding

[quote="Jawson" post=977132][quote="dankek" post=977124][quote="DEADMONSTOR" post=977115]Says he doesnt know that he was doing best of 3 >> Rolls 3 times [/quote] Yeah, this does seem really shady from Jawson's part. He clearly knew at that point it was bo3, and he rolled three times. This seems very sketchy.[/quote] Don't you mean the opposite? FawDaw posted two sets of rules, he literally just said it in this thread. If he were to win on the first roll, he would have pointed it out and stopped rolling.[/quote] DICLAIMER: [i]I CAN'T BLOODY READ THE NAMES AND WHO POSTS WHAT, SO I'M JUST GUESSING AFTER A POINT IN THE SCREENSHOT[/i] You see, he didn't try to trick you, the guy could've honestly missed to write that rule, and you both sort of unexplicitly understood that and [u][i]continued to roll three times.[/i][/u] Neither of you froze and looked back and said "oh look, hey it's bo1 so pay up". Bo1 wasn't explicitly stated and you both understood it was bo3 still, and continued to roll. Like I said, this looks like a misunderstanding