Rice Seeds wrote: you still can't assume it just because you think it's obvious. there's absolutely no proof of him hacking so you are not allowed to ban him. the policy states that you need an SA+ to use anticheat so you can take action otherwise you can't do anything about the person.

[quote="Rice Seeds" post=965666][quote="Spicy" post=965665]Hold on, im not gonna quote it since I am doing this on my phone but you punished someone for hacking while you disn’t know they where hacking since you had no anticheat proof or they didn’t confess to it?[/quote] It was obvius because its not possible to do that and he was keep on rdming us in 1 second in the head which is impossible[/quote] you still can't assume it just because you think it's obvious. there's absolutely no proof of him hacking so you are not allowed to ban him. the policy states that you need an SA+ to use anticheat so you can take action otherwise you can't do anything about the person.