Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
Random death match, or else known as RDM, is killing somebody without a valid RP reason. One good example would be: X player who’s playing as a citizen kills Y gun dealer for no reason.
Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
New life rule, or else known as NLR, is interacting with the district you were last killed in after respawning within three minutes. X player gets raided and killed in his base in Y district. He respawns then comes back to the district he died in within 30 seconds to save whatever printers/raidables he still has.
Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
I’d ask player X for proof and I’d do the following;
If the proof were valid I’d TP to player y and ask him if I could TP him to a roof. Then, if he had the time I would TP y to the roof so I can handle the report, and he can give me his testification.
If the proof weren’t valid/or there weren’t any, I’d TP to player y and ask him if I could TP him to a roof. Then, if he had the time I would TP y to the roof so I can handle the report, and he can give me his testification. If he admitted to it, I’d probably warn him if he had recents or even request a higher ranking member for a ban if he had many recents. If he did not have recents, I’d probably let him off with a talk to.
Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
Assuming he died in the same district twice within 3 minutes apart, I’d ask him why he broke NLR, fully informing him it’s not allowed and NLR exists to have a better gameplay experience. If person y didn’t have recents and player X didn’t have a problem with the situation, I’d let him off with a talk to. Otherwise, I’d warn him or perhaps even request a ban from a higher ranking staff, if he had too many recents.
Why I should be chosen(we recommend around 150 words):
I believe I’m a very fair person judicially, and I can weigh the importance of a situation very well. I used to be a moderator last summer but I resigned very quickly due to lack of time. In sits, I used to be very friendly and always tried to take account of the user who is making the report more than anything, so he can be satisfied with a fair outcome. This summer I have everything sorted out, and this will not be a problem.