Blocked wrote: Completely disregarding the content of this report, I personally disagree. Several people have already mentioned that this report should fit in with my plans to improve transparency, but a lead team member reporting a community team member publically like this isn't transparency.

There are plenty of ways people could be transparent about the outcome of reports such as these, including in private circles. If possible action is undertaken, an official announcement post could explain which action and why. It could also be in the weekly community team meeting outcome, like when Onion got reported back in January.

The CM team was already made aware of these concerns regarding Tyler days ago and we were already looking into this. With or without a public report, an outcome would have been reached and this could have been explained in countless ways to users if needed (and, yes, in this case it would be needed).

[quote="Blocked" post=937841][quote="TheCorgi" post=937823]I can understand where you're coming from... but like was this demote request actually necessary? You're a LT member with plenty of ways to get in contact with the other CMs, I feel like this is more for drama than anything. We both know you know better and can do better.[/quote] Personally, if I was wronged by a highly ranked staff member I would want to bring that issue to light and make sure the community is well aware of the wrongdoings, handling it privately would seem more of a cover up rather than a situation being dealt with properly, my two cents, that's all.[/quote] Completely disregarding the content of this report, I personally disagree. Several people have already mentioned that this report should fit in with my plans to improve transparency, but a lead team member reporting a community team member publically like this isn't transparency. There are plenty of ways people could be transparent about the outcome of reports such as these, including in private circles. If possible action is undertaken, an official announcement post could explain which action and why. It could also be in the weekly community team meeting outcome, like when Onion got reported back in January. The CM team was already made aware of these concerns regarding Tyler days ago and we were already looking into this. With or without a public report, an outcome would have been reached and this could have been explained in countless ways to users if needed (and, yes, in this case it would be needed).