You was still under gun point, it doesn't matter if you were behind a wall
right ok this is where my PERP expertise come into play here
if you have a small enough distance between you and a wall to cover yourself and pull out a gun to defend yourself, you can shoot.
the entire idea of fearrp is to not endanger your life; this is not really endangering his life, as he made sure you couldn't just shoot him by ducking behind cover.
I'll try to get a video as a visual presentation of such theory
EDIT: here's an example:
This was from a PERP report on me which was denied, as my actions were deemed as acceptable and not risking my life. You can see I ducked behind cover, over a MUCH longer distance than Pug did, and shot him while not entirely risking my life. Considering PERP has much stricter rules on risking your life, if what I did was fine, then the warning given to Pug was totally excessive.
PERP = ZARP? xd RhysB wrote:
474 Denis wrote:
TimeForPug wrote:
Clarky wrote:
You was still under gun point, it doesn't matter if you were behind a wall
Gunpoint? You cannot fucking see me
I play RP servers regular. I know how gunpoint works lmao
Tbh im waiting for you to tell me to kill myself again
gunpoint
noun
while threatening someone or being threatened with a gun.
"two robbers held a family at gunpoint while they searched their house"
Technically speaking according to the definition he was still at gunpoint regardless of being behind a wall hence the definition example explicitly stating that the individual does not have to be in direct view of the person holding them at gunpoint for them to be considered to be "at gunpoint"
2 robbers = 1 robs other 1 aims at family.
If both of the robbers weren't holding people at gunpoint one with the balls probably tried to run away
Oh u smart
I mean wouldn't you run away if both of them were in another room or grab a weapon